Video Surveillance Software

Web Camera Pro set the standard for efficient, AI-assisted video surveillance.

SmartVision takes it further — with greater stability, continuous development, and new features already on the roadmap. If you want a system that’s not just reliable today but ready for tomorrow, SmartVision is the way forward.

Free Downloads

SmartVision v.5.5
Release date: January 10, 2026

Download the installation file, run smartvisionsetup.exe and select the desired folder during installation. After installation, a shortcut to launch the application will be automatically created.

Download VMS Software

Video Surveillance Software for Windows

CCTV Software for Windows

Download Mobile Apps for Android

CCTV Software

Web Camera Pro — Smart, Detailed, and Practical Surveillance

Now evolved into SmartVision - more stable, more advanced, and actively developed. Looking for a VMS that doesn’t fill disks with hours of nothing? Web Camera Pro has been a trusted solution for years, using built-in AI to record only what matters. It detects motion intelligently, distinguishes people, vehicles, pets, and supports face recognition - so you capture relevant events instead of noise. Today, the product has taken the next step in its evolution: the new generation is called SmartVision. This version offers significantly improved stability, faster performance, and regular feature updates, ensuring it will remain at the cutting edge of video surveillance technology for years to come.

What makes it different
  • AI-driven recording: Starts only when motion is meaningful. Objects and faces are recognized to reduce false alarms and unnecessary clips.
  • Time-lapse mode (1 fps, H.264): Records one frame per second and compresses efficiently - ideal for long, uneventful intervals. Compared with 25 fps continuous video, that’s ~96% fewer frames, which can slash storage needs and lower hardware costs.
  • Cleaner archives: By saving just the important moments (events + time-lapse), your timeline stays compact and easier to review.

Recording modes you can combine
  • Event-based: AI motion/object/face triggers.
  • Continuous: When you need an uninterrupted stream.
  • Time-lapse: Long retention with minimal storage.
  • Set per-camera schedules, retention, and quality to fit each scene.

Fast setup, smooth daily use
  • One-click installation and a multi-monitor interface with intuitive drag-and-drop.
  • Works with USB and IP cameras—no dedicated static IP or router port-forwarding required.
  • Quick camera discovery and straightforward configuration get you up and running in minutes.

Review and search - without the headache
  • Event timeline with snapshots lets you jump straight to the action.
  • Face recognition (optional) helps you label known individuals using your local face library, speeding up reviews.
  • Export MP4 clips or snapshots for sharing or backup.

Accuracy and reliability
  • Deep learning algorithms improve detection quality in real-world conditions (changing light, shadows, background movement).
  • Sensitivity, zones, and ignore areas help reduce false positives from trees, reflections, or distant traffic.

Resource and storage efficiency
  • Targeted recording + compression reduce disk usage dramatically.
  • Flexible bitrate and resolution settings allow you to balance clarity and retention length per camera.
  • Time-lapse provides long-term context without the storage burden of full-rate video.

Security and privacy by design
  • Records locally on your machine and minimizes unnecessary footage by default.
  • Per-camera access control and password-protected settings help prevent unauthorized changes.

Typical use cases
  • Home: Entrances, yards, garages—get alerts only when something meaningful happens.
  • Office/retail: Monitor doors, cash areas, and storerooms with searchable event logs.
  • Warehouses/sites: Mix time-lapse for long periods with event recording for activity spikes.

Key specs at a glance
  • AI motion/object detection and face recognition
  • Time-lapse 1 fps with H.264 compression
  • USB & IP camera support
  • Multi-monitor UI, drag-and-drop camera management
  • Per-camera schedules, zones, sensitivity, and retention
  • Event timeline, quick export to MP4/snapshots

VMS Software

This year SmartVision got faster, more stable and more honest. No magic, no marketing spells, no promise that "it will just figure it out". In real video surveillance there are no miracles. There is architecture, compute, physics and occasionally common sense. It also turned out to be a perfect year to show why software wins against the shiny "all-in-one box", even if that box has the word Smart printed on three sides of the packaging.
What Load Really Depends On (Spoiler: Not Megapixels)

Ask anyone in the industry what load depends on and you get the classic answer: number of cameras, resolution, frames per second. Which is about as useful as saying that your health depends on food and sleep. Technically true. Practically useless.
In the real world, system load is almost entirely driven by functionality. Not by the logo. Not by the sticker on the box. Not by how loudly it says Smart. It depends on what the system actually does with the video stream.
Historically it was all very simple and oddly honest.

Camera looks. Disk writes. Archive grows. Once in a while someone remembers that they need to review something and digs into this digital attic. The camera understands nothing. It just sprays the stream at the recorder. Like a night guard who sees everything and comprehends nothing. Then cities grew. Warehouses, parking lots, malls and use cases multiplied. Archives inflated to terabytes. False alarms became a lifestyle. The operator turned into a human time machine, rewinding yesterday for a living.
At some point it became obvious: "record everything forever" is not reliability. It is architectural laziness. You need motion detection, analytics, noise filtering. Not for the buzzwords, but for survival. Less archive, fewer useless alerts, less pointless human work.

Ten Years Of "Smart" On The Box, One Answer In Support

Enter marketing. Boxes got new titles: Smart DVR, AI Camera, Intelligent VMS. Any device without "Smart" in the name felt obsolete before it left the warehouse.
If you believed the brochures, ten years ago video surveillance should already have been able to:
  • understand who is in front of the camera
  • tell a cat from an intruder
  • ignore snow, rain and shadows
  • and ideally predict what you are trying to see
Now open user forums or Reddit threads and you land in a parallel universe.
The daily tech support dialogue is almost always the same:
  • "It is not detecting anything."
  • "Did you update the firmware?"
Detects the curtain moving: update the firmware.
Fails to detect a human: update the firmware.
Camera does not connect: update the firmware.
Connects, but only on Tuesdays: update the firmware.

Users have been updating recorders, cameras and their own hope for years. The miracle stubbornly refuses to appear.

On top of that you get some industry "traditions":
  • the pretty boxed camera refuses to connect until you install the latest update
  • the connection workflow is so weird it feels easier to align a satellite
  • configuration still requires Internet Explorer that your modern machine simply refuses to install
  • the UI looks like it was designed for an 800×600 CRT and a ball mouse
  • "security" is solved with a password the size of a Victorian novel
And no, it is not because users are stupid. The problem is in the architecture. In software that was originally built for a different era and very different tasks. Rewriting everything from scratch is painful and expensive for the manufacturer, and terrifying for integrators and customers who know exactly what "major update" means: risk, stress and night shifts. So the industry lives in a permanent mode called "one more firmware".

Why A Box Does Not Become Smart After A New Firmware

Most DVRs and "smart" cameras are powered by a compromise System on Chip that was perfectly fine in the era of "write stream to disk". The world has moved on a bit since then.
Modern analytics needs to:
  • decode each frame
  • run it through several layers of detectors
  • decide what to do next
In other words, software that was built for "continuous recording" is being stretched into "AI platform". That is how you end up in the firmware Groundhog Day. The hardware is already at its limit, the architecture was never designed for this, but marketing really wants one more checkbox in the spec sheet. You cannot turn a cheap old NVR into a serious AI system by flashing it often enough. This is not about "optimizing the code". This is physics. If the box has a modest SoC that already struggles with H.265, it will not suddenly start calmly running face detection, OCR, smoke detection and speech to text on top. The laws of thermodynamics are not impressed by your roadmap.

"Just Record Video" Is Cheap, "Understand Video" Is Not

Plain continuous recording is easy mode. The camera sends a stream, the system writes it to disk. H.264 in, H.264 to storage. H.265 in, H.265 to storage. No analysis, no transcoding. Load is minimal. Everyone is happy, at least until someone asks "what exactly happened yesterday at 3:24 AM".
H.265 saves disk space, but with a catch. You cannot just play that stream in a browser. For the web you usually have to transcode it to H.264. So you save money on storage and spend it on CPU or GPU. One way or another, you pay.
SmartVision lets you make an explicit choice. Record the stream "as is" over ONVIF or transcode it for maximum compatibility. But the second you want to understand what is going on in the scene, the rules change. Analytics starts with frame level access. Every frame must be decoded, passed through a light detector to check that the image is not frozen and that there is real motion, then forwarded to heavier modules: object detection, face recognition, license plates, smoke, fire, sound, you name it. To keep the system alive you can downsample in time. You do not have to analyze all 25 or 30 fps. Sometimes 10 fps is enough. It is still a heavy workload. GPUs love this type of task. But with a sane architecture and modern software you can build a very capable intelligent system on regular CPUs too. The key point is this: software decides how to distribute the load. A closed black box does not give you that kind of control by design.

Software vs Appliance: Who Owns The Brain

The main difference between software based video surveillance and the classic recorder is simple. Freedom and scalability.
What software gives you:
  • you are not locked to a single camera vendor
  • you do not have to replace hardware to get new features
  • even a budget camera can become part of an intelligent system because the brains live in the software stack, not inside a sealed plastic box
  • you scale compute by upgrading a standard PC or server, not by throwing away a "next generation" NVR every few years
How the appliance world usually works:
  • vendor X expects you to use cameras X
  • want parking analytics? welcome to product line Y with its own logic, limitations and sometimes unique protocol flavor
  • want to monitor a nanny by sound, detect crying, shouting and adult presence? here comes another specialized box
  • need license plates, faces, age and gender, people counting and smoke detection near the warehouse? that will be yet another "series"
The end result is predictable. A zoo of devices, protocols and user interfaces. Every new requirement drags in a new appliance, a new firmware, a new integration headache. In the software world, the script is different. You build architecture once, then add modules. Need a smoke detector? you connect it. Need speech transcription? you enable it. A new model for behavior analytics arrives? you update the software, not the camera fleet.

When A Small Software Team Beats A Giant Hardware Brand

Large corporations are defined by their legacy. Thousands of developers, committees, release trains and a lot of sacred code that no one wants to touch. As long as the old web interface still technically opens, it is very hard to justify rewriting it, even if customers run it inside a Windows XP VM just to configure cameras. Smaller teams live in a different reality. "It does not work at a customer site" is not a ticket for some quarterly review. It is a fire that needs putting out today. There are no holy relics like "that ancient CGI page from 2011 that integrators are used to, so do not touch it".
SmartVision was built as software without that baggage. Not "let us hack one more checkbox into the NVR menu", but "let us design the system around a modern service architecture and use AI where it actually helps". Services get split by responsibility. Analytics, storage, UI, cloud access each have their own role. You can improve, replace or scale parts without risking the entire stack. That is the sort of evolution that is practically impossible inside a locked appliance.

What Software Already Delivers That A Box Cannot Fake

By the end of 2025 SmartVision could already:
  • recognize license plates from different countries
  • run OCR and read QR codes
  • transcribe speech
  • detect objects in the scene
  • recognize faces and search for similar ones
  • detect smoke and fire
  • maintain archive, events and timelapse
  • provide cloud access on top
All of that on regular computers. No requirement to buy "flagship AI cameras" priced like a used car. In 2026 more detectors and scenarios are being layered on top. Better audio analytics here, behavioral patterns there, more context from text inside the frame. The important part stays the same. The intelligence lives in software. A boxed NVR in a similar situation tends to offer firmware version 5.4.7 with a note that "experimental feature X has been added". Then 5.4.8. Then 5.5.0. Somewhere at the bottom in small print it quietly warns that if you enable that feature, channel capacity is halved and the list of compatible cameras shrinks to a handful of models.

Why The Future Belongs To Software, Not The Next "Smart" Box

Recorders are not going away. They still have a perfectly valid niche:
  • continuous recording
  • simple scenarios
  • minimal logic
But the moment the task moves beyond "please store this video", the balance of power flips.

Software turns:
  • video and audio into data
  • data into events
  • events into actions
And it does this on infrastructure that you control. Need more analytics? you add a GPU or a stronger CPU. Need redundancy? you add another server. With a closed appliance the usual answer is simpler: "not enough performance? buy our new recorder".
The video surveillance industry is growing up slowly and a bit awkwardly. Lots of band aids on top of band aids. A cult of firmware releases instead of real progress. The real shift from "the box records" to "the system understands" is not about new plastic. It is about normal software and sane architecture.

You can buy a basic camera, install SmartVision on a regular PC and get a system that, a few years ago, looked like a trade show demo. No tax for the "ultra smart AI" label on the box. No firmware marathons. No feeling that the future has been postponed until the next update cycle.

The future of video surveillance is already here. It just moved out of the black box and into software. And the best part is that what runs it now is not magic. It is engineering that finally does what the brochures have been promising for a decade.
Use your mobile phones for CCTV surveillance
Mobile app
Use smartphone as an IP Camera.
Wi-Fi
Desktop Software
Video Surveillance Software for PC
Real-time object detection
VSaaS Service
Remote CCTV monitoring